i knew you were doing a new build, thats why i tried to help and look into it too and mentioned that protobufmsg had members missing..
Ayuto wrote:One reason could be that you haven't asked a question.
dont know if im doing sthn wrong, but when i try to import ProtobufMessage with the latest build, not all class members are registered
i stated my confusion and gave a reason why. impossible to help in this context?
i understand that it is easier for you to requireusers to ask exact questions.
but you forget, that its impossible for the user who just has a problem understanding, to ask a question that includes the correct understanding.
thats why told you in another post, that communication skills also include, trying to understand the "question behind the message".
especially when you answer a lot of people. if you dont do that, you might add even more confusion to the user and they stop using forums etc.
thats also what i felt when instead of helping you asked
Ayuto wrote:"whats missing"
as if everything was there, and my confusion unjustified?
following that confusion i looked into the source and saw that all members who werent added were using the same pointer
google:

rotobuf::Message
so then i thought that i have to add the pointer manually and pointed it out.
but then you got me confused again and said:
No idea what you mean...
Ayuto wrote:I still don't know which pointer you are talking about and why you want to add something. You would just need to compile SP or wait for version 255.
if its not a pointer, take it for what it is, call it an address or whatever word you like.
but even better: correct me about wehre you think im wrong. otherwise again, you only increase my confusion